Compliance posture per application, not per organisation, so readiness stops being one number for everything.
AppEdge moves compliance from the organisation to the application. Today a readiness figure is one number for the whole company, which is the average of a well run platform and a legacy system nobody wants to discuss, and it hides both.
With an application entity underneath, readiness reads as a position per application, weighted by how critical each one is. That is a different conversation with a board, and a considerably more useful one with an engineering team.
| Feature | Milestone | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Application inventory with criticality tiering | v1.0 | In MVP v1.0 |
| Per application framework readiness | v1.0 | In MVP v1.0 |
| Criticality weighted organisation rollup | v1.1 | Planned |
| Per application control state and mapping | v1.2 | Planned |
| Guided application onboarding | v1.3 | Planned |
Milestones are roadmap targets, not shipped dates. Target for MVP v1.0: Q4 2026. Provisioning is white-glove, never self-serve.
What this establishes. These products prepare you for certification and audit. They do not award either. Every figure is derived from what your organisation reports, and is a documented position rather than an independent verification.
Walk the workspace before anything is provisioned. Start an assessment first and the simulation is populated with your own position rather than a demonstration dataset.
Once this product reaches Live it is provisioned to your organisation and configured to your environment, and its own product website opens. It is not there yet, and we would rather say so.
Provisioning is white-glove rather than self-serve, and scope follows the due diligence review. The stage above is the honest position today, not a target.